The Rising Price of Retirement

As more people work part-time rather than hit the greens, the formula for how much they need to live on is changing. Their tax rate may not fall, and expenses may be higher than planned.

Mention the word "retirement," and most people shudder. The term seems synonymous these days with the phrase, "you can't afford it." More than half of workers in the 2011 Retirement Confidence Survey by the Employee Benefits Research Institute say the total value of their household's savings and investments, excluding the value of their home and any defined benefit plans, is less than $25,000. Housing wealth has vaporized for many households. More than 27 percent of all residential properties with a mortgage—13.4 million homeowners—had negative-equity or near-negative-equity mortgages at the end of 2010, according to CoreLogic, an information and analytics firm.

Times remain tough even though the stock market is up 97 percent from its March 2009 low and the economy is gathering steam. The government's broadest measure of unemployment, and underemployment, is at 15.7 percent, and household budgets are being squeezed by rising food and oil prices—not to mention miniscule yields on savings. It all reinforces the fact that one must confront huge areas of uncertainty when planning for the last stage of life. The answer to the question "how much will you need?" depends on a series of imponderables, from the timing of your death to your health in old age.

Nevertheless, the pervasive gloom about retirement is overdone. Fact is, people are quite creative at coming up with solutions. Case in point: An aging generation isn't really retiring, at least not in the traditional sense of the word. (Think golf.) They may say goodbye to their employer and colleagues for the last time, but they're continuing to work, usually part-time. (Think consulting.) Call it the partial retirement or the job-tirement. It allows savings to compound longer. Delaying taking Social Security benefits locks in a more generous payout. "People aren't slowing down in their 60s and 70s," says Ross Levin, a certified financial planner (CFP) and president of Accredited Investors in Edina, Minn. Adds Joel Larsen, a CFP with Navion Financial Advisors in Davis, Calif.: "If you really like what you're doing, why retire?"

WHEN INCOME REPLACES SAVINGS

Just ask Don Lambert, age 67. The engineering manager retired from Fisher Controls (now Emerson Process Management, a division of Emerson) in 2002. He spent 32 years with the company, half of it abroad, mostly working on projects in the Middle East and Africa. He lives in Ames, Iowa, and when he retired he set up a consulting firm with Fisher as a client. He spent two years on contract with Fisher in Saudi Arabia, where the only thing he had to pay for out of pocket was his "newspaper and haircuts." He still works about two days a week and spends the rest of his time doing community volunteer work with the Rotary International, Meals on Wheels, and the Iowa Council for International Understanding. Lambert has a defined benefit pension plan, Social Security, savings, and no debt. He takes out roughly 3 percent of his savings a year. "I don't need to draw on a lot of my savings yet," he says.

The twin benefit from a higher Social Security benefit and returns that have compounded longer is striking. The Social Security payout rises 8 percent a year for every year of delay after age 62 and before age 70. Laurence Kotlikoff, finance professor at Boston University and head of ESPlanner, an online financial planning website, ran a simulation. Among the key assumptions: A couple is 60 years old, each earns $100,000, and they have a total retirement portfolio worth $2 million. If they elect to take Social Security at age 62 in 2013, they draw on enough of their savings for a total income averaging around $140,000 for the next 38 years. That means they can maintain their standard of living at 70 percent of preretirement income.

Yet if the same couple shifts to part-time work in 2013, making $30,000 each for four years, draws on their 401(k)s, and waits until age 70 to file for Social Security, their discretionary spending jumps by 14 percent, to nearly $160,000 over the next four decades. "To get the same living-standard-hike, the couple would need to find $455,000 lying on the street," says Kotlikoff.

UNDERMINING OLD RULES OF THUMB

But (you knew the "but" was coming, didn't you?) working longer complicates everyday money management by upending a few critical and common assumptions. A traditional benchmark is that in order for households to maintain their standard of living in retirement, they need approximately 70 percent of preretirement income. The lower figure comes from the assumption that a retiree will drop into a lower tax bracket, have more time to shop for deals, and won't incur many expenses associated with work. For instance, economists Mark Aguir of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and Erik Hurst of the University of Chicago delved into household data on food gathered by the U.S. Agriculture Dept. from the late '80s and early-to-mid '90s. They found spending on food fell 17 percent among retired households while the time spent making meals rose by 53 percent. There was no real difference between eating out at table-service restaurants for those aged 60 to 62 (pre-peak retirement) and those 66 to 68 (post-peak retirement), except that the retired household spent 31 percent less on fast food and diners.

The old rule is obsolete for the partially retired. The retiree's tax bracket may not drop. The dry cleaning bill will probably stay the same. They're busy and just as likely to grab a burger before a meeting or stop for a takeout meal on the way home as they did before retirement. "I don't think the 70 percent rule applies," says Moshe Milesky, finance professor at York University in Canada and a wealth management and retirement expert. "It may be higher than that."

The other big change is that an aging, income-earning household needs to save from every paycheck, just like their younger co-workers. After all, the cost of goods and services used by the elderly is going up. True, over the past 12 months the consumer price index is up a mere 2.1 percent. Yet that average masks some critical differences. Fuel oil is up 27.1 percent and medical services 3 percent over the same period—a big blow to the budgets of the elderly—while the price of personal computers is down by 7.4 percent, which may be a boon to younger folks. Mutual fund giant Fidelity estimates a 65-year-old couple retiring in 2011 will need $230,000 to pay for medical expenses throughout retirement (and that does not include nursing-home care). "Every single one of our friends has had some serious financial surprise during retirement that was completely unseen," says Henry "Bud" Hebeler, the former president of Boeing Aerospace. His own "retirement" turned into a career offering retirement and financial-planning advice at his website, Analyzenow.com.

Hebeler has devised his own formula for how much to save in retirement while working. He recommends taking your monthly take-home pay, after all deductions and taxes; multiply it by the number of years you will still work, and divide that figure by the number of years it's possible you have to live. For example, say a 65-year-old plans on working another 10 years, expects to live to 95, and makes $2,100 a month after deductions for Social Security, Medicare, union dues, and the like. The monthly amount she can spend from that paycheck would be $700 (2,100 x 10/30 = $700). The remaining $1,400 should go right into savings. Clearly, this isn't our parent's retirement.

Do You Need Long-Term Care Insurance?

According to the Department of Health and Human Services, those of uswho reach age 65 will have a 40% chance of entering a nursing home, and 10% will stay in one for five years or more. So does this mean you need long-term care insurance? Possibly.
Those numbers don't take into account the millions of aging adults who will need some kind of in-home care as their health falters. By 2020, 12 million older Americans will need long-term care, according to one government estimate. Most will be cared for at home by family members.

Long-term insurance is marketed as a way to fill in the financial gaps if you have a chronic illness or disability and need help with the activities of daily life, like bathing and getting dressed.

"The additional expense of long-term [care] can be $40,000-$90,000 a year," says Rich Arzaga, founder of Cornerstone Wealth Management. "The average American cannot survive this risk and expense." Nor can you count on the government to bail you out when the time comes: Medicare doesn't pay for "custodial care." Medicare pays only for medically necessary, skilled nursing facility or home health care. It may not give you the choice of the best care in your area. And while Medicaid pays for certain types of care for the low-income elderly, who is eligible and what services are covered varies from state to state, and is determined by such things as income and personal resources.

"Many folks wrongly believe that letting the government pay for their anticipated long-term care needs is the best solution, but Medicaid programs are in trouble funding-wise in every state," says Wilma Anderson, a registered financial consultant. "In the future Medicaid may become even harder to qualify for. If you don't plan for LTC, you may have limited or no choices to pay for care when your health changes."

Here are four things to consider when planning for long-term care:

How will you pay the bills?: Many financial planners and elder care experts say long term care insurance is a good place to start. It typically helps pay for things that your medical insurance won't, like in-home care, or remodeling your home so you can stay in it longer. But as with all forms of insurance, it's vital do your research.

Investigate the cost of a stand-alone long-term care policy: The younger you are, the lower the premium will be. The cost really depends on factors like family health history, age, how much insurance you think you'll need, how long you'll need it, where care is received, and more, explains Marion Somers, PhD, author of Elder Care Made Easier: Doctor Marion's 10 Steps to Help You Care for an Aging Loved One.

Shop around for the best policies and prices. Benefits vary: Weigh the scope of coverage, benefit and waiting periods, inflation protection and other factors against your income and health needs.

Read the fine print: "Insurance companies may try to offer added-value features beyond the basic benefits, but most of them don't add much value at all. Be thoughtful and realistic about your needs and priorities," says Ryan Malone, founder of InsideElderCare.com.

Truthfully, says Somers, "Not everyone needs long-term care insurance, but everyone needs a plan."

AARP Retirement Calculator

Retirement is a goal to be relished, not dreaded. 

Yet for many people, thinking about retirement can be overwhelming. Am I saving enough? When can I afford to stop working? How long will my money last?

Now, the answers are right at your fingertips. Use the AARP Retirement Calculator to plan your financial future so you can retire when — and how — you want. You've got options. This calculator will help you discover what they are.

10% off any order over $55 at Case-mate & free shipping! Use code: cmsave10

Source:  http://www.aarp.org/work/retirement-planning/retirement_calculator/

South Carolina Senior Policies | InsuranceSCNow.com

 

Got Insurance? Enough? You Sure?

Many U.S. homeowners haven't insured their homes against earthquakes and other disasters, but the devastating losses in the wake of the recent earthquake and tsunami in Japan may cause people to give their insurance policies another look.

Find hotel deals at Expedia! As well they should.

Earthquakes have occurred in 39 states since 1900, according to the Insurance Information Institute, a nonprofit supported by the insurance industry. Earthquakes have caused damage in all 50 states, according to the group.

April 18 marks the 105th anniversary of the great San Francisco quake of 1906. That temblor caused an estimated $524 million in property loss at the time; it would have cost $96 billion had it occurred in 2009, according to AIR Worldwide, a provider of risk modeling software and consulting services. With a standard homeowners policy, you're not covered for damage to your home or possessions in the event of an earthquake, meaning the damage occurring from the shaking and cracking. Flood damage also is typically not included in your basic policy, says Scott Spencer, world-wide appraisal and loss-prevention manager at Chubb Personal Insurance. To be covered for both, you have to buy an endorsement or separate policy. "Most people are not adequately insured for a total loss, but total losses are so rare," says Amy Bach, executive director of United Policyholders, a nonprofit advocate for insurance consumers. But, "if you lose the bet and something really bad happens, it can be pretty awful to not have the coverage you thought you had." Even in California, only 12% of residents have earthquake coverage. That's partly because earthquake coverage in high-risk areas can be prohibitively expensive, Ms. Bach says. While people pay in the range of $500 to $2,000 a year for basic homeowners insurance, the total cost of insuring an older home in San Francisco with earthquake insurance, for example, can cost an additional $2,000 to $5,000, Ms. Bach says. The cost of coverage varies based on where in the country you live and how old the home is, since newer building codes often make structures more resilient, according to Pete Moraga, spokesman for the Insurance Information Network of California, a nonprofit aimed at educating consumers. Get a Fast Approval on the cash you need this Season. California isn't the only part of the country where earthquakes pose a risk. For example, earlier this year, a 4.7 magnitude earthquake occurred in Arkansas -- the most severe quake the state experienced in 35 years, according to the Insurance Information Institute. Flood insurance is typically less cost-prohibitive to those who need it. To protect a home against flood damage, recognize the area's flood history and know if your home is in a flood zone, Mr. Spencer says. Earthquake insurance is available through private insurance companies, as an add-on. In California, it's available through the California Earthquake Authority, says Jeanne M. Salvatore, senior vice president of public affairs for the Insurance Information Institute. Flood insurance is made available through the National Flood Insurance Program as well as private insurance companies. On the other hand, wind damage caused to a home by a tornado is generally covered through your standard homeowners insurance, Ms. Salvatore says. The tornado season runs from April through July, but some of the most severe storms hit in the spring, according to theInsurance Information Institute. And in most states, wind damage due to a hurricane is also covered in the standard contract, Mr. Spencer says. That said, some policies in certain states exclude wind coverage -- though that practice isn't typical. "Wind deductibles are more common than policies excluding wind all together," he says, adding that the policies require homeowners to pay either a percentage or a flat dollar amount for losses due to wind-related damage. So it's worth checking to make sure your policy will adequately cover any losses. Insurance is determined based on what it would cost to rebuild your home, not its market value -- and the cost of construction has gone up in recent years. The replacement value of your home may have been $250,000 when you bought it 10 years ago, but it might cost $500,000 to build it today. Coverage should be re-evaluated regularly, Mr. Spencer says. To protect against increased construction costs, homeowners can add extended replacement-cost coverage to their basic policies, Ms. Bach says.

She also recommends buying building-code upgrade coverage, which ensures that if the codes have changed and you need to rebuild, the insurance company pays for the increased costs. When you add these items, Ms. Bach says, raise your deductible to at least $1,000 to keep your premium affordable. Get the NEW Android Powered LG Optimus Q! Finally, research insurers, selecting one that offers a good quality of coverage -- not just the lowest price, Mr. Spencer says. 

[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="200" caption="Source: Wikipedia"] "Many people think insurance is insurance and you buy a policy and they're all the same," he says. "But the offerings are as vast as cars. You can buy a Dodge Neon or a Cadillac Escalade.
 

 Visit | InsuranceSCNow.com for more info regarding South Carolina Life Insurance, Health Insurance, Final Expense, Financial Solutions, Online Quotes, and more. 

401(k)s: When Opting Out Makes Sense

In spite of legislation that has made it more difficult for workers to opt out of their 401(k) plans, as many as one in five do just that. And a surprising number of advisers say that's not necessarily the wrong choice.

No one can be forced to save for retirement, but automatically enrolling employees in 401(k) plans was supposed to come close.

And in the five years since the Pension Protection Act gave companies legal cover to default their workers into the plans, participation is up -- opting out is apparently too much of a hassle for most employees. But even at companies that enroll every new employee as a matter of course, the dropout rate remains between 10% and 20%, a figure that seems stubborn to change, experts say. "Frankly I'm stunned that it's that high," says Roger Wohlner, of Asset Strategy Consultants. "You can lead a person to water, but you can't make them drink. More education is clearly needed here and more access to advice."

Companies have recently stepped up education efforts to convince employees it's in their best interest to rejoin the plans, but the tactic that has proven most successful is automatically re-enrolling employees every year, says David Wray, president of the Profit Sharing/401k Council of America. "Companies find that over time, employees get worn down, and they get a few more people each year."

Most people who opt out of their 401(k) plans do so because they need the money, Jeanne Thompson, Fidelity's vice president of retirement insights, says. Younger and lower-paid workers are the likeliest to drop out with 25% of employees earning between $20,000 to $40,000 not participating compared to just 8% of those earning more than $100,000, she says.

Among plans administered by Fidelity, 10% of automatically enrolled employees opt out of their plans, and another 8% reduce their contributions from the default, which typically ranges from 3% to 6%.

Still, the dropout rate is lower than in plans that don't automatically enroll their workers.
Nationally, 31% of employees do not participate in their company-offered plans, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. For low-wage workers, that proportion jumps to 58%, according to Fidelity.

For those who aren't in dire financial straits, conventional wisdom holds that dropping out of one's 401(k) is generally as foolish as dropping out of high school. But there are some exceptions. If there is no company match, says Charles Buck, a financial planner in Minnesota, investors may be better off with a Roth IRA, if they qualify. A Roth IRA at a brokerage will offer more investment options, he says, many with lower fees. Also, for young people who may be saving to buy a house, a Roth IRA allows savers to withdraw their principal, penalty-free. Buck's advice to his own 30-year-old son: "Participate only to the limits of the employer match, and fund a Roth IRA with the rest."

Other advisers say that poor investment choices, or high expenses, can be a good reason to opt-out of a 401(k) plan. The best 401(k) plans charges employees as little as 10 basis points, says Mike Alfred, CEO of BrightScope, which rates plans nationwide. "There are also plans with expensive insurance costs that can run as high as 9% -- investing in a high fee 401k plan can cost a worker hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost savings over their working career when compared to a lower cost plan. In cases where all-in fees get that high, it's hard to argue with an adviser's assertion that the participant might be better served to invest elsewhere."

Click Here to get FREE FedEx SHIPPING with your order! No Coupon Code required

Learn more at InsuranceSCNow.com

South Carolina Life Insurance

South Carolina Health Insurance

South Carolina Final Expense

and other financial solutions.

Questions/Comments?

E-mail broker@insurancescnow.com